I discovered on Saturday that the song
“Comme un Boomerang” that I’ve been learning doesn’t fit with my chronological
approach to translating Serge Gainsbourg songs. It turns out that there is
another song by him from 1966 called “Boomerang” and that the one I translated
was published in the 1970s but not released until 2001. I’m not going to be
obsessive compulsive about it though. I’ll finish the song because I like it a
lot and then I’ll go back to the chronology.
I finally got an
email from the Australian Boot Company telling me that I could replace my
Blundies under warranty. But I got them from the store on February 12, 2015, so
I wonder if the warranty is still good. Plus, I didn’t pay for them myself, as
they were a gift from my friend Audrey, so even if it’s under warranty they
might need notification from her as proof of purchase. I emailed them about it
and the response was that it doesn’t matter. If the boot has damage that
doesn’t fit with its age the warranty still stands and I don’t need proof of
purchase. The manager’s exact wording was, “Once we have a go ahead from Blundstone
Canada on a warranty, it’s a yes, no mater what. All I have to do is bring the
boots in (I’ll remove the laces though, since I bought those to replace the old
ones). That’s pretty nice and it seems like a rare policy for a company to
have.
I
wanted to work towards starting my Philosophy essay but I had to do the reading
of Averroes in order to answer next week’s tutorial question. I think I would
have been able to start my essay last week if not for those stupid, complicated
assignments that the TAs assign. Even though our responses are supposed to be
short, I often have to read the text several times just to understand it enough
to come up with a response.
The
question I chose was: What
do you think of Averroes' argument that philosophical study of the world is
mandated by religious law? How is this related to some of the arguments we've
considered for God's existence?
Here’s my answer:
Religion needs a conscience in order
to keep it from being too sure of itself. Philosophy can fill that role and
also serve as a bridge between religions, because there are commonalities in
logical thinking that may not be shared by the dogma of two given religions.
Certainly the “proofs of the existence of god” that the Christian, Anselm and
the Muslim, Avicenna have arrived at through their separate applications of
logic are not incompatible with one another.
No comments:
Post a Comment