It was raining on Monday but not enough so
I’d have to sit with a damp ass in Romantic Literature class. About halfway
there someone pointed out that my backpack was open. The main zipper on my
knapsack is starting to lose its grip and so sometimes I have to run it along
the tracks again to get it to hold on. If it’s loose in some small area it will
come apart entirely until I fully open it and then re-zip it. I’d first bought
the epac because it had a ten-year warranty and according to my memory I
purchased it in December 2008. Since then I’ve renewed it twice by riding out
to northeast Mississauga to the Hayes Company. The receipt was too faded last
time I renewed it for me to see the date but according to the people at Hayes
the warranty was finished in December 2016. Each backpack lasted me about three
years. I don’t know how much longer my current one will survive.
I
was the first student in the classroom. All of he desks had been pushed
together up towards the front. They certainly weren’t moved to one side of the
room to clean the other side because it was still filthy. There was one left
over take-out meal at the bottom of one of the desks and a couple of abandoned
coffee cups. I think that the design of the desks, with the storage area at the
bottom contributes to forgetting things. If students keep leaving food around
they might end up with a cockroach problem.
The
desk that Professor Weisman uses was where it should be but I put her lectern
in the position she likes and lifted the projector screen. There was only piece
of chalk big enough to fit onto my thumbnail but a professor came in and wanted
to take it because he had none. I told him that if he took it we wouldn’t have
any and so he left it. If I hadn’t gotten there early the chalk might have been
gone.
I
sat and perused my essay. I underlined words that I’d repeated and circled
phrases that I liked but needed to be moved somewhere else.
I
went to use the washroom and saw our professor sitting in the common area. When
I came out she was just arriving in the classroom.
We
discussed the sad state of the room and how OISE in general is not a great
building for classes because the subway is always rumbling underneath.
Our
lecture was the last one on Wordsworth.
In
the Prelude Wordsworth is describing the preparation for his great philosophic
poem. He imagines that he has to lay the foundation so people know who is
writing it. He’s trying to convey his prophetic understanding on the depths of
human nature. He’s establishing what is foundational and important is to
release oneself from the fretful, unprofitable stir, to immerse oneself in the
rustic life and to establish continuity between the child and the adult in
oneself.
Of
his description of skating, suddenly stopping and feeling the entire universe
spinning around him, she says people have to have skated to know what he’s
talking about. Professor Weinstein is from Winnipeg where she says there is a
saying that it’s against the law to walk until you've learned to skate.
Wordsworth
writes about spots of time, which are imprints and a function of memory.
Recalling moments of significance. Is it really possible to recollect being a
child without analysis? We murder to dissect. Spots of time, like his memories
of Tintern Abbey, have the power of renewal. A spot is also spatial. In Book
11, line 268: “This efficacious spirit lurks among those passages of life in
which we have the deepest feeling that the mind is lord and master and that
outward sense is the obedient servant of her will.” Nature is a servant of the
mind. Recollection itself is analytic.
Of
the story Wordsworth tells of having stolen a boat when he was five, he
experiences an optical illusion when he feels like the cliff is chasing him as
a kind of chastizement and this is a crisis moment, though he doesn't say that
it was an optical illusion. There are guilty overtones with a related feeling
of pride. His boundaries are checked by power or voice. He localizes the time
and place. His dipping of the oars in the water has the rhythm of heartbeat.
His pleasure is stolen and so it comes with guilty overtones. The experience is
almost mystical. The primacy of the mind’s reaction makes it a spot of time.
Ronan
observed that all of Wordsworth’s points of time take place when he’s alone but
I brought up his sharing of Tintern Abbey with his sister. The professor
pointed out that Dorothy’s experience was also solitary and he just recognized
it. I added that he was also with a friend when he crossed the Alps but she
said he’d become separated from him momentarily when he had the experience of
looking down on the sea of mist. His experience of individuality is important.
In
Book 13 his view of looking down on the mist is a metaphor for the elevation of
mankind. He sees in the external scene the image of his own mental powers. The
moon dominates the mist. The imagination imposes unity on the external world.
The mind is both receiver and creator. The mind is not enslaved by nature.
I
brought up how Wordsworth’s description of looking down on the mist is very
similar to the painting “Wanderer Above the Sea of Fog” by Caspar David
Friedrich. She was familiar with the painting and agreed that it made for an
interesting parallel.
Wordsworth’s
experience was ordinary but powerful.
The poem teaches
us that the mind of man is 1000 times more beautiful than the Earth.
The professor
posed us a question: Taking into account spots of time, in what way is the mind
of man more beautiful than the Earth?
I said that only a
human could have these experiences and think of them. This kind of experience
in the Alps followed by impressions of what it means such as a mighty feeling
on infinity is not going to be had by a big horn sheep. Human mind has the ability to mould and to
abstract and to translate the experience in such a way as to share it with a
less sensitive mind.
These are moments
with profound significance but he’s not enslaved to them. The mind is master.
The mind is reflexive and reflecting on its experience of nature. The mind is
essentially interpretive.
Just after the
class ended I told Professor Weinstein that I understand how the Prelude can be
considered as Wordsworth’s crowning achievement from a philosophical point of
view or from an autobiographical perspective but artistically it seems to me
that his Lyrical Ballads are much more creatively constructed works of art,
especially “We Are Seven”.
On our way out she
asked me what else I’m taking. I told her that I’d be taking Creative Writing
in January with Albert Moritz. She said, “He’s good!” I said that I know Albert
from the poetry scene and that I took Academic Bridging with his wife, Theresa.
I recounted how when she was sick for one class he came in and taught the
poetry section. He brought in a little blaster and played us Blues songs as
poetry to start.
On the way home I
stopped at Freshco where I bought oranges, a hothouse tomato and the most
bizarre looking black grapes I’d ever seen. Instead of being round or oval they
were stretched out like cocktail wieners. The name on the bag just said “black
seedless grapes” but I figured these must have a special name. When I went home
I looked them up and at first I thought that they were called “witch fingers”
but it turns out that is another type of long grape with a pointed end. The
ones I bought were apparently developed by the same grower and they are called
“Moon drops”. They only first came out last year but I never saw them. One might
think they are GMO but they aren’t, thought the seeds are started in test
tubes. They feel a bit perverse in the hand but they are sweet.
I
rubbed rosemary, garlic, olive oil and salt into the half sirloin pork roast
that I’d bought. I seared it in the oven at high temperature for half an hour
and then lowered the heat. Since I didn’t plan on drinking the stuff I poured a
can of Budweiser over the whole thing and basted it while it was roasting. The
beer and the rosemary were a great combination and made the pork delicious.
I
watched an episode of Perry Mason. In the story, a wealthy man named Carr is
searching for the heiress to the Hocksley estate has placed an ad in the
newspaper. If she can prove she is the late Hocksley’s daughter she would receive
$2 million. An old man named Lowell who runs a photo shop is showing the ad to
Doris Hocksley and encouraging her to try. Doris goes to see Carr’s nephew,
Alan Neil, who is in charge of finding the heiress. She tells him that she has
no photograph of her father but she did receive a book and a photograph with a
note on the back from China before Adam Hocksley died there. The note said
something about him having been betrayed by a Judas. She kept the Bible but
threw away the picture. Alan tells her he thinks she’s a fraud but that if she
was interested splitting the $2 million he might be interested in telling his
uncle that she’s the real heiress. Doris goes to Perry Mason and he says he’ll
look into it. He meets with Carr, who is pushed into the room in a wheelchair
by a Chinese gentleman. Carr says that Adam Hocksley was killed by the Chinese
Communists and that he was wounded but saved by Gow Loong, the man behind him.
The Judas that Hocksley had referred to is Lowell, the man who shoed Doris the
ad. Gow Loong has sworn to kill Lowell. Alan mentions that there is a woman
named Miriam Hocksley who is also claiming the inheritance. Mason goes to see
Miriam and she also seems to have as valid a claim as Doris. That night, Carr’s
secretary Rebecca calls Mason to tell him that there’s been a shooting and that
she’s locked the shooter in the library with Carr’s body. He tells her to call
the police and that he would be right over too. They find Carr dead with a gun
beside him and Doris is sitting in shock nearby clutching a Bible and a
photograph. Lieutenant Tragg finds an old pocket watch on Carr containing the
combination to his safe. He opens it but inside there is nothing but an empty
tin box. Tragg takes the Bible and the photo from Doris and she is led to get
medical attention and later to be arrested. Mason finds that the Bible fits
perfectly in the box. Mason goes to see Doris in the hospital. She says that
Carr had phoned her to come there. No one answered the door but it was open.
When she got to the library Carr was already dead. She picked up the gun and
accidentally pulled the trigger, shooting a bullet into the floor. She tells
Mason about the deal that Alan had offered her. She says that Lowell had
brought her from San Francisco an exact copy of the photograph she’d thrown
away years ago, even though she’d only met him four months ago. Mason goes to
San Francisco to Lowell’s photo shop but he is gone. Gow Loong is there as well
and has found out that Lowell didn’t really betray them for money but because
he was forced to on the threat of death. He forgives him. In court Mason
challenges Alan to account for where he was at the time of the murder. He
admits that he and Miriam Hocksley got married. Mason gets permission to try an
experiment with the tin box. Much to the protest of the DA, Mason forces open a
false bottom and inside is the same photograph that Doris had. The judge
adjourns the court to consider this new development. That night Mason gets a
call from a woman who says she’s Miriam Hocksley. She says she killed him and she’s going to kill herself. Then he
hears a shot and the line goes dead. Mason calls the police and goes to Alan’s
apartment. When he gets there Miriam is being taken away in a stretcher with a
40-60 chance but Alan is dead. Mason finds a bullet in the wall but Alan was
shot in bed. Mason tells Tragg to come with him to the Carr house. Mason tells
Rebecca that there is no use acting because Miriam is alive. Rebecca gasps. She
says she loved Alan and he’d said he loved her but she couldn’t stand it when
he married Miriam and so she tried to make it look like Miriam killed Alan and
then committed suicide.
No comments:
Post a Comment