On
Wednesday I was still low on energy and so, since I had an appointment with my
TA around midday to talk about my essay, I took a siesta at 9:30. Shortly after
getting up at 11:00, I started getting ready to leave by 11:45. It was a very
warm day for the end of February and so I bundled up a little less for my ride
downtown. I wore my spring gloves but put my winter gloves in my backpack just
in case.
I hate going places and doing
things.
There were new potholes on O’Hara,
Maple Grove and Brock. Every time I go out it’s almost like being on different
streets. It seems to me that there are
more potholes this year than any previous winter. It turns out that I’m right.
Between January 1st and February 13th of this year the
city of Toronto filled in 46,294 potholes. That’s more than were filled during
the same period in the last two years combined and 7,000 more than in the same
period in 2013, which was a very similar winter to this one. It’s freezing
followed by sudden thawing that causes most potholes and the temperature has
yo-yoed like that all winter long. We’re going to have a lot more road closures
this summer I’ll bet.
I was half an hour early and since
the weather was so was nice I sat outside the Jackman Building and looked over
my essay. After a few minutes though a woman sat down at the bench across from
me and lit a cigarette, and so I went inside and took the elevator to the
seventh floor. I didn’t have to write down the room number because it was 711,
which is the date when Donald Trump honours the victims of the great Slurpie
flood. The door was propped open by a chair. I stood in the hall, only peeking
in but Ira heard me and told me to enter. He’d been alone for his first
appointment slot, so that meant there hadn’t been any need for me to wait
downstairs.
I went over the three main questions
of interest I have in comparing T.S. Eliot’s “The Wasteland” with Allen
Ginsberg’s “Howl”. I told him that “The Wasteland” and “Howl” are kind of the
two sides of the same coin in that each has its own wasteland effected by
forces that impose themselves on sexuality. Eliot’s wasteland has been caused
by rape and Ginsberg’s was brought about by the prohibition of homosexuality.
Each of these serves as a metaphor for overall devastation in their respective
worlds. I said I was also interested in the fact that in “The Wasteland” there
are individual women characterized, whereas in “Howl” the women are generically
grouped. The third thing that I wanted to look at is that both “The Wasteland”
and “Howl” have a character that draws together the two sexes. In Eliot’s work
it’s the transgender prophet Tiresias that acts as a bridge between men and
women, while Ginsberg presents Neal Cassady as a godlike bisexual hero with the
power to satisfy both men and women.
Ira liked the first and second idea
but said that if I use the one about generic versus individual women I have to
offer a reason why this difference exists in the two works.
It’s always good to come and see
one’s TA before turning in a paper because it tends to positively affect one’s
mark. I asked Ira if he would be grading my essay but he answered that he could
only promise that he’d try. This worried me because one is often assessed
according to how the TA sees that the student has listened to their advice. If
a different TA marks a student’s paper than the one that advises them about it,
the positive psychological effect of having gone to see one’s TA is lost. Ira
gave me some assurance by saying that he was taking note of everyone that comes
to see him and he was going to try to make sure that he was the one that marks
the essays of those students.
My appointment had been for 12:30
but since I’d gone in early I was out of there by 12:40. I rode back to
Parkdale and before going home I went over to the Lucky Supermarket to buy a
bag of spicy plantain chips. The place is the same but there were different
people behind the counter than I’d seen before. The store sells a lot of West
Indian products but all the staff seems to be from Pakistan, as did the new
couple that served me. Nobody is unfriendly there but I’ve never seen a more
perky and gregarious seeming couple than this man and woman. There was a line-up
for the checkout as usual, but they smiled and thanked every customer as if
each of them had done them a big favour by shopping there.
A cute, kind of punky looking little
teenage Gypsy woman stepped into line behind me and swore at the length of the
line. She only bought a bottle of water and when she left the store, handed it
to an older woman who looked like she might be her mother that was standing
outside with another woman. They all talked loudly as they walked up the street
and went into H & R Block.
I went home and while I was
unlocking my door, Benji came out of his room to complain about the guy in the
apartment above him. He said it sounds like the guy is jumping all the time. I
suggested that maybe he’s dancing. He added that he thinks the man is a
homosexual because he’s always bringing guys up from the street into his place.
He also assessed that Nickie, the Jamaican woman in apartment 1 is probably a
lesbian. He seemed to be basing that claim on the fact that Nickie got her
apartment on the recommendation of Greg, who used to live in apartment 5,
because Greg is Gay, plus she also knows the guy on the third floor we’d just
talked about. I told him that gay men and lesbians don’t necessarily hang out
that much and I proposed that maybe they know each other because they are all
Jamaican. Then I thought Benji said, “If the committee finds out, they’re gonna
have problems!” I suddenly envisioned some draconian anti-gay organization that
I hadn’t been aware of. “What committee?” I asked. He corrected me that he’d
said the “community” and clarified that he meant the Jamaican community, which
he said is against homosexuality. He recounted that someone had called my
Ethiopian upstairs neighbour, David, a “buttyman” and he asked Benji what it
meant. Benji expressed the worry that our building will get a reputation for
being a gay building. I thought that would make for hilarious architecture if
buildings had sexual preferences. I told him I didn’t care if anyone thinks our
building is a homosexual building.
No comments:
Post a Comment