On
Friday morning at the end of the second week since the bottom of my foot was punctured
by that piece of wood, my foot hurt almost as much as it did the day of the
accident and my limp was more pronounced. The black spot where the puncture
occurred has shrunk but my foot is still slightly swollen. They say a deep
wound can take several weeks to heal.
That morning I finished posting my
translation of “Eva” by Serge Gainsbourg and began memorizing his “Zig Zig Avec
Toi” (Zig Zig With You). He seems to be playing with the “zig” from "zig
heil" and the expression "zig zag" and perhaps he’s also making
fun of the zig zag shape of the swastika. I remember that all the years my
father smoked until suddenly quitting before I became a teenager, he always
rolled his own from Zig-Zag brand tobacco with Vogue papers
I had two chicken hot dogs for
lunch.
In the afternoon I did my exercises
while listening to Amos and Andy. This story continues from the previous one in
which Sapphire left Kingfish for good. She’s been staying with her mother at
her house in Brooklyn but Kingfish does not know that they are planning to
vacation in Florida and to rent out the house while they are gone. Sapphire’s
mother has bought her daughter new dresses and has told her to burn the old
ones in the furnace in the basement. They rent the house to a man who takes Sapphire's
bedroom as his. Kingfish misses Sapphire and decides to go to Brooklyn to plead
with her. He and Andy climb up a ladder to Sapphire’s bedroom but find the room
is full of a man’s things. When the man comes home they hide in the bathtub but
he reaches in and turns on the hot water. They break the window and fall to the
ground. Later they discover the remains of Sapphire's burnt dresses beside the
furnace. The man is building flower boxes in the basement but all they know is
that he’s building boxes, which they think are coffins. They conclude that he
has killed Sapphire and her mother.
I worked some more on
my reflection paper:
The parallels
between the Wet’suwet’en hereditary chiefs and the hereditary chief of the
nation of Canada are not as solid in relation to the land. While Indigenous
hereditary leadership is intrinsically tied to a territory, Canada's hereditary
chief is the symbolic caretaker of so much land that it would be impossible for
her to have a deep connection with it all. To be fair, if the Wet’suwet’en
leaders had control over one sixth of the planet’s surface they probably would
be less concerned about 190 kilometres of pipeline in the arm pit of
Canada.
But despite there being no documented official
spiritual connection to the land on the part of Canada’s hereditary chiefs, the
two future Canadian hereditary chiefs, Charles and William, are both very
outspoken and active on environmental issues. If they were allowed to take
sides they might indeed side with the Wet’suwet’en hereditary chiefs on
the issue of the pipeline, as does the mainstream media.
The two Macleans
Magazine opinion pieces and the twelve CBC articles that resulted from a Google
search of “Wet’suwet’en” were all very supportive of the anti-pipeline
protests. They all mention gratuitously
as a passing attempt at balance that twenty
elected band councils signed benefits agreements. But both Macleans and the CBC seemed to deliberately avoid
publishing quotes from Indigenous leaders that are opposed to the protests.
Only one news source featured such opposing views from Indigenous
leaders and I was refreshingly surprised to discover that it was APTN.
Kathleen Martens
of APTN gave very balanced coverage of the Wet'suwet'en pipeline protests by
giving voice to all Indigenous sides of the debate and not just that of those
opposing the pipeline. She even quoted Dale
Swampy, president of the National Coalition of Chiefs
saying that poor Native people on the streets of Vancouver and Calgary are
being offered hundreds of dollars to protest against the pipeline in order to
counterbalance the fact that the majority of protestors are white. This is a
claim that no one else has repeated and which does not seem to have surfaced
anywhere else. As a former street person I can confirm that the homeless could
be paid to protest but it would be impossible to pay them to shut up about it
afterwards. The fact that only Swampy is repeating a claim that would be common
knowledge if true strongly suggests that it is merely a conspiracy theory.
Later in the day
my limp wasn’t as bad until I stepped on a crack in the floorboards and pinched
the wound.
I cooked the six
pork souvlakis that I’d bought recently. I also fixed the too thick gravy that
I’d made the night before by adding some chicken broth. I had two of the
souvlaki for dinner with a potato and gravy while watching Zorro.
In this story a
merchant returning to Los Angeles discovers a Chinese man stowed away in his
wagon. The man speaks no English and so he cannot communicate his circumstances.
Through sign language Bernardo is able to discern that the man escaped from a
ship. Sgt Garcia is confused because there are no Chinese people in Los
Angeles. He is forced to place the man in jail. The man has written a page of
text in Chinese and so Diego attempts to get it translated. It turns out that a
friar from a nearby mission is able to read some Chinese although it has been
years since he has tried. Meanwhile a sea captain named Vinson arrives claiming
that the Chinese man is an escaped murderer. Garcia releases his prisoner into
the captain’s custody just as Diego discovers that the man is actually a
Chinese prince named Chiu Chang who had been kidnapped for ransom. Zorro
intercepts the captain in the mountains and in the midst of a fight the captain
falls to his death. Chiu Chang is shipped back to Shanghai in style.
Chiu Chang was
played by the great character actor James Hong, who auditioned for the role of
Sulu in Star Trek but lost to George Takei.
But how could they
know Chiu Chang was a prince just because he wrote it on a piece of paper?
No comments:
Post a Comment