On Monday morning I memorized another eight
verses of “Le bras méchanique” (The Mechanical Arm) by Serge Gainsbourg.
I weighed 88.8
kilos before breakfast.
I tried to listen
to a bit more of the online lecture but in twenty minutes I only got from the
20 minute mark of a 34 minute video to 22.
I had the rest of
the broccoli I’d steamed last night in a salad with cucumber, tomato, avocado,
green onion, parsley, dill and a the rest of my raspberry dressing.
After an hour and
three-quarters siesta I logged onto the Indigenous Studies course site to try
to listen to the last fifteen minutes of one lecture and the one hour long
final one. I didn’t expect to have a good connection and was already
considering taking my laptop outside to sit on the sidewalk in front of the
café again. But amazingly I had had pretty much steady wifi for both lectures
and even had to stop it and go back a bit to catch stuff I missed. I was
finished in an hour and a half.
I did my course
assessment and gave bad reviews of both the instructor and my TA. It was the
most scathing critique of a course I've ever given.
Part
B of “Rename, Reclaim, Reoccupy”:
He
says renaming is in a way a type of colonization. Only in a metaphorical way.
Indigenous
people reasserting their identity through reciprocal relationship with
traditional places. The offer to co-name a place comes from colonizer to
accepting the older history of the place.
There
was a lot of anger towards Indigenous people two weeks ago and the media turned
comments off.
Assertion
of rights is newer. When asking government to honour treaties Indigenous people
are viewed as having a special relationship to the governments of Canada, the
crown and the US. It is seen as unfair.
How
we look at treaty language is important.
UNDRIP
is important because Canada, US, Australia and New Zealand did not sign at
first. But they voted no for legal reasons and not because they disagreed with
the declaration. They didn’t want to put themselves at a disadvantage in court
later on during treaty negotiations.
Gomer
is not a good writer and he makes grammatically incorrect shortcuts in Tarzan
talk for his slides.
It
was so noisy out on the street that I couldn’t hear my laptop very well.
On
social media there were calls to violence against protesters. The rhetoric is
centuries old.
Under
whose authority are the stories told? The two perspectives of Little Big Horn.
Textual material about the military resolving conflicts and ignoring the
Indigenous side. One needs a cultural context to understand that the dancing
and singing after Little Big Horn was not in victory but mourning.
Signs
are moved to a less visible place to de-emphasize what looks bad.
He
went to the Boyd-Parker massacre site in Grade Seven. Indigenous villages were
destroyed and two men were tortured. They intended to wipe the Iroquois from
the Earth. Now there are signs up with no prominent Indigenous side. The
Indigenous perspective is on a sign on the other side of the rock where few
people go.
Is
the inherent name enough?
There
is a history of connection so when Indigenous people know the name why not
change it back to original?
Squaw
peak, New Mexico. He said “S” word Peak although he said “Squaw” in part A.
Sirens,
traffic, streetcars.
First
Indigenous woman to die in terror attack.
Authorities
say the name has become morphed in myth and so it can’t be changed.
Not
many people out but lots of vehicles.
If
we are co-existing why ignore the Indigenous perspective?
Changes
take root like a plant. I guess he means if one changes the name then other
changes will follow. I’m not sure if there’s any guarantee of that.
At
his old institution in Hooterville it used to be called Iroquois Studies but
they fought for 25 years to change it to Haudenosaunee Studies.
The
Six Nations have six languages and each has a different name for the same
places. Sometimes if they move they will take the name with them. The
Haudenosaunee moved to another place with a spring and gave it the same name.
So how is that different then?
There
is already a London, England and so why is there a London. Ontario? They draw
from the authenticity of the old world to remake into the old world ideal.
Return to a place of long ago.
What
about land acknowledgements? Does anyone really think about what they mean?
Would all nations with their different histories agree?
The
Dish with One Spoon became a trading place.
Naming
is a powerful tool of colonization and the maintenance of long standing
cultural relationships.
Places
can have more than one name.
There
are special locations around North America that are sacred because their
energies and cultures are collectively understood by many nations. These areas
are where people set aside their differences because they find strength there.
An example is The Badlands for the Lakota, the Cheyenne and the Arapaho. The
nation of the United States however saw it as a place to exploit for gold,
which was a treaty violation.
A
Mohawk man was brought to trial in Canada and insisted on being tried in the
Mohawk language. He said that he was being tried in Mohawk territory and so his
language should be spoken. Mohawk speakers were brought in.
Conquest
is rejected on treaty language.
White
says he is new here in Toronto and there are new customs for him to learn but
he is still Haudenosaunee. He always declares his nationality to be Mohawk at
the border. It would be too complex to tell customs he is Haudenosaunee because
it is not written on any of his identification cards. When he came to live in
Canada he was classified as a new settler. He does not consider himself an
expatriate of the United States. He has roots on both sides because he is
Haudenosaunee and because of the 1794 Jay treaty. More about himself, that the
Mohawks recognize him but the Seneca don’t entirely, boo hoo. Nobody owned the
land and all that used it had a responsibility to the land, each other and
future generations.
He
says the names of Toronto Streets honour Eurocentric models. Most of the names
are actually after people with connections to Canada.
There
are no reservations in Canada in provinces that don’t have roads named
“Colonization Road”.
Who
are the naming experts in languages?
When
Goner was a grad student he worked in a state park near Buffalo. He was
returning a library book when someone commented on his shirt with the lake name
on it, “Canandaigua". They argued about how it was pronounced. The Mohawks
have a different pronunciation than the Seneca. He says the name refers to
apple blossoms turning the fields white. They would have to have been crab
apples if the name is that old, since any other kind of apples didn't come to
western New York until the 18th Century.
If
we don’t know the proper names for places, who are the experts? Is it important?
I
moved on to listen to and make notes on the final lecture, which was about
Vanessa Watts’s essay on Indigenous Place and Thought and Agency Amongst Humans
and Non-Humans.
We
were supposed to have had a course review on March 30.
Watts
is looking at the subject through two lenses, as an Indigenous person and an
Indigenous woman.
Most
Indigenous thought interweaves action, thinking, understanding and knowledge.
She emphasizes agency and inclusivity of
female and animal. While western thought, philosophy, theology and
culture gives agency only to humans. The idea that only humans think and have
reason and that humans stand at the pinnacle, outside of the natural world.
Well, certainly animals have some degree of reason in relation to their immediate environments but they don’t have the complex levels of reason that is built upon the having language. Animals can’t think about thinking.
Well, certainly animals have some degree of reason in relation to their immediate environments but they don’t have the complex levels of reason that is built upon the having language. Animals can’t think about thinking.
This results in a
culture clash. Western thinking results in economies of extraction.
Because of
coronavirus western people on social media are worried. He says so0me other
cultural groups see this time as linked with the natural world. Native social
media says this is a chance for the Earth to heal. Pollution is dropping
because factories are closed and fewer planes are flying.
At the end of the
extinction game when man is all that is left what will have been won?
For Indigenous
people women and the land sit at key points. Women are more muted in the west.
Among the Haudenosaunee women collectively owned the clearings and men the
forests. In the west men owned everything. They did not become the land but
rather took from it. Is that the most effective for a reciprocal relationship
with the natural world?
We know where we
come from. We miss everyday connections to place.
There were
treaties to balance the homeland.
Mythologizing
Indigenous stories separates Indigenous people from the natural world and
allows for colonialism. He objects to calling stories “myths".
The west’s
creation stories are the big bang, Genesis or creative design somewhere in
between. Indigenous understanding has reciprocity in ceremonies of thanksgiving
to renew the world. Things recur. The first robin and flowers budding are signs
of spring showing that the world continues.
Indigenous people
say that everything had original instructions for our benefit. Living in
natural cycles we have abundant life. Hunters, fishers and maplers watch the
cycles.
If one looks at
the west the natural world and childbirth are punishments for the original sin
of partaking of the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil. Pandora’s box is
similar with a punishment for curiosity. There are Indigenous versions of this
as well.
The west presents
its stories as untouchably true.
The Indigenous
stories are not myths. Bits and pieces of stories are interwoven through many
nations. There are common Anishnaabe, Cherokee and Plains tales.
In the west the
thinking is all put together. Someone is trying to find the original source of
some Indigenous stories, and presumes that someone started them. It’s
problematic to think that oral history relies on human memory.
The creator placed
thoughts into seeds and those seeds created the first woman.
Skywoman from
Skyworld came down to Waterworld and needed to find a way to live there.
Gambling for the
seeds of creation.
If we dismiss the
stories as mythology we miss the patterns.
First of all to
call the stories myths is not a dismissal. It allows for the metaphorical
unpacking of the stories.
In Haudenosaunee
creation stories specific things are planted by the creator or Flint. Creator
or Sapling creates something and then creates something else to balance it.
Sapling created berries so that when humans arrived each could eat one berry
and be contented. But his twin brother Flint thought that would be too easy and
so he put thorns on the vines so pickers would have to work. Then something
else is created to also eat the berries so that there will be balance.
Invasive species
result from a lack of balance. The emerald ash borer may decimate the
Indigenous basket industry. Overpopulation is another imbalance that can result
in famine and dying off.
Before
colonization one could drink from Lake Ontario and eat the fish.
The two world
views clash on creation. Thought, power of imagery, human renewal is rooted in
place.
He considers
Rochester home but in school it was Buffalo, then Oswego and now Toronto.
Because it’s all about him. He says that all these locations around Lake
Ontario and Lake Erie are part of the traditional lands of his ancestors. Women
took the umbilical cords of their babies and buried them to root in the place.
Place and thought cannot be separated. I don’t see why not. One often thinks
without thinking of place.
Colonists
connected to places and became part of the landscape but did not reciprocate.
Colonization removes Indigenous reminders of home. Not always. Lots of place
names in Canada are Indigenous, including Canada, Ontario, Toronto and Spadina.
Settlers came in
and rather than finding new ways they remade the new into the old.
The conceptual
framework of the pre-colonial mind is healthy mindedness that has been altered
but overlaid. He says colonial thinking is unhealthy mindedness. Good and evil
are western ideas whereas healthy and unhealthy mindedness are Indigenous ideas.
What’s the difference? Is evil not unhealthy?
Some Indigenous
people are trying to return to the pre-colonial diet. Chicken and pork are not
precolonial but venison and bison are safe. He says he likes cheeseburgers too
much to give them up.
Watts cosmologizes
and declares that the stories actually happened. He once believed that as well.
He thinks Skywoman is part of creation but that she is not physically real. The
story of creation is about recovering the grief of Skywoman’s experience of an
ecological disaster.
The west says
there can only be on truth but he says all can be right. That sounds like lazy
thinking to me.
Colonization is
about delegitimatizing Indigenous knowledge through purposeful and ignorant
misrepresentation of Indigenous cosmologies. Actually colonization is about
forming and settling in colonies. If colonists did something bad to Indigenous
people it had nothing to do inherently with being colonists. It had to do with
being assholes.
Stories are
systems of knowledge. Movies are sometimes an extension of books and books are
an extension of creative thinking. Many films are based on true stories.
Knowledge is
erased in mythologizing Indigenous cosmologies. The opposite is actually true.
The people that starve themselves of the truths presented in the Bible and
other myths are those that believe the stories are literally true.
He’s been around
the world but feels most comfortable in Dish with one spoon area.
Healthy mindedness
comes from well-balanced living.
He is agnostic but
believes in the spiritual forces of the natural world.
We discovered that
he does not hold our attention.
Creation can be
connected to the same place. He had a garden back in Hooterville but might
plant one in pots so he can be connected in Toronto.
Stories a
primitive mind can understand. Indigenous people maintained these
relationships. Spirit goes into place. Thought which determines agency with creation,
which becomes societies extensions and obligation to communicate back to
spirit. All of this is interwoven. Indigenous scholars expanded a circular
system expanding exponentially constructed epistemologically sidesteps for
removal of the point of abscess that doesn’t come back to the beginning.
Gobbledeegook.
The west think in
linear time and history is recorded. God altered specific moments.
People in sporting
events sometimes thank god. Does god really care if their team wins?
Indigenous
thinking is about cycles of nature in a pattern.
Versions of the
Haudenosaunee creation story say that once humans had populated the worlds then
clans came as a way to identify kin relationships like seeds that were planted
and became akin to one another. Humans were allowed to take root and populate
the back of the turtle but they forgot their original instructions. So the
creator had to come back to reinstall four ceremonies, re-instruct and break
the people back up into clans. Each
clan has duties learned from a specific animal. Medicines come from the bear
clan because they learn about them from watching bears. Settlers assume that
all Indigenous people are interchangeable.
People have
different gifts. Some students write essay, some prefer tests and some prefer
learning by talking.
The danger of
overlaying western interpretations on Indigenous philosophical frameworks is
flawed because they don’t understand that one comes from experience. There was
divine intervention in both systems. Indigenous knowledge is not faith based
but based on experience. He has faith that is true. When enough people see the same
thing they see a pattern of the natural world. That is how to establish
relationship and reciprocity with that relationship. Pragmatic lived
experience. Indigenous versus community.
The best student
may be considered to be the one with the highest GPA but there is also the
shared experience of common learning.
The west assumes
that animals and plants behave without reason but during the Australian fires
animals rescued other animals that were not of their species. He's referring to
a social media post about wombats that Greenpeace reposted but later deleted
because it was unsubstantiated. Apparently wombats are extremely short sighted
and wouldn’t be able to shepherd other animals into their burrows as was
claimed. Gomer just believes anything that supports what he believes. What a
scientist! It's more likely that other animals just took shelter in the wombat
tunnels on their own.
Animals and plants
are more knowledgeable than we think. Animals were put here first to serve as
our guides and to remind us when we forget our obligations to the natural
world.
The west sees the
natural world as something to be conquered.
Does the natural
world fear death? Is death part of life to begin with? Do humans fear death?
Each animal comprehends death differently. Dogs go off by themselves because
they know it is the end. Do we think in the same way? Animals do fight to live
but death is part of the cycle of life.
The Skywoman is a
botanist braiding sweet grass. There is a story of a discussion between
Skywoman and an enlightened botanist. The land bears the scars of that meeting.
Eve is told she got the short end of the stick. Place is feminine.
Clashes of world
views.
In the end he
called Skywoman “Skywalker”.
I steamed a bunch
of asparagus and had it in a salad with tomato, cucumber, avocado, dill,
parsley and green onion. I have a lot of mustard squeeze containers that still
contain mustard but not enough to squeeze. I used one to make mustard dressing
with vinegar, olive oil, garlic, salt pepper, honey and dill. It turned out
pretty good. I ate while watching two episodes of Noggin the Nog.
The first was the
end of the first set of stories about Noggin travelling north to ask Nooka of
the Nooks to be his queen. They are married and the giant bird Graculas flies
back to the Land of the Nogs to let everyone know that Noggin has married and
can now legitimately become the king rather than his evil Uncle Nogbad the Bad.
But when Graculas returns to Nog he is captured by Nogbad and put in a dungeon.
The six week pass and Nogbad goes to declare himself king. Graculas speaks to a
robin that comes to his cell window and gives him one of his green feathers to
take to Noggin’s mother to show that he is in Nog. Although the robin cannot
speak Brunhilda learns from sign language that Graculas is in Nogbad’s dungeon.
She sends her guards to rescue him and then banishes Nogbad from the kingdom.
The story doesn’t explain how Nogbad could take the throne anyway since there
is no indication that he is married.
The next story I
watched is the first of a second set. A Scottish sounding man named Ronf from
the Hot Water Valley comes to Noggin to ask for his help. He says that in his
land a giant dragon is terrorizing his people and trampling their crops. They
will starve unless something is done. Noggin agrees to go with Ronf to fight
the dragon.