On my way to the first class of the new
term on Monday, September 12th, I got off my bike to cross over to the bike stands at the south end of
the Sidney Smith building. On the side of St George to which I was crossing
there was an old man with a sign that read, “Save Humanity Close University”.
As I got to his side of the street he waved and smiled at me. I smiled back
because he’d made my day.
The
lecture hall for aesthetics is the same one where I took Canadian Short Stories
two years before, though it seems like only last year. Neither of my two
courses this year are in unfamiliar places, so it was a relief to not have to
scout them out beforehand.
I
opened the door to the lecture hall, and though there was no class going on,
two young teacher types were discussing something official. I asked, “Is it
okay for me to come in here, or are you busy?” The guy answered, “We’re busy
until 13:00.” Since they were only talking at the front of the room, I couldn’t
see how anyone sitting in the seats would be a disturbance to whatever business
they were engaged in, but maybe they were easily distracted. I sat to wait on a
chair in the hallway.
As
my fellow students gradually gathered in groups or alone, to wait for
Aesthetics, it was clear that, as usual, there was no one much over twenty
among them, if any.
Once
the room opened up, a young woman coming in with her friends wanted them to sit
in the front row, but they didn’t want to look like “keeners”. “People who sit
in the front get better marks!” she argued.
The
professor came in at least ten minutes before start time and began to set up.
He looked a little too young to be officially a professor though, so he may be
a PHD student who landed a much better job than that of being a teaching
assistant this time around. At the very most, I’d say he’s thirty.
He
was wearing a blue shirt and a tie and jeans. I’ve seen that look before, so it
may be a thing, but it seems like an odd choice to me, probably because I
despise ties altogether. Wearing a tie with jeans is like being let out of
prison and not having to wear an orange jumpsuit but still having to wear an
ankle monitor.
Our
instructor projected a slide on the screen that instead of “Aesthetics” as the
course was called at the time of enrolment, read “The Philosophy of Art”. It
made sense, so I knew that I was still in the right place.
He
paced slowly but nervously behind his podium as he waited to start. I could
easily be the teacher’s father and possibly his grandfather. Maybe I am. Just
from watching him, I didn’t get the impression that he was going to be a very
engaging instructor, but one never knows. I admitted that the ice might break
once he was in lecture mode.
After
welcoming us, he explained the title of the course. He said that Aesthetics and
the Philosophy of Art are the same thing, but the second name is more precise.
He promised us from the start that since it would be all about procedure, our
first class was going to be boring.
He
outlined the issues that we would be dealing with in the Philosophy of Art: How
do we define art? What distinguishes high from low art? What is artistically
special about photography or video games? He said that we would not just be
answering these questions, but rather evaluating arguments with reasons from
which we could choose the best answers.
We
needed two textbooks for this course: The third edition of the Routledge
Companion to Aesthetics and the third edition of Aesthetics: a Reader in the
Philosophy of the Arts. We also needed something called an iclicker. It’s
possible that I was the only student in the dark when I asked, “What is an
iclicker, how do I get one and will it cost me money?” As he explained what it
was, I remembered that I had observed classes other than my own use them in the
past. It’s an electronic voting tool, used to gather statistics and they are
collectively tuned to a computer that automatically calculates percentages. I
guess it’s probably a good way to take attendance as well to make sure a
student is in class. I would buy it at the U of T Bookstore, but he didn’t know
how much it would cost. Once we had one we would have to register our device
online.
Every
week, except this first week and the two weeks that we have quizzes, there will
a writing assignment in which we write a short paragraph that presents and
explains the argument of one of the three readings, including an interesting
claim and an example from everyday life to explain it.
Also
once a week we have to anonymously peer review our fellow classmates’
paragraphs, giving them a star rating between one and six stars, one star
meaning it was total trash.
We
will have to write two essays for this course. The first will be a theoretical
essay in which we will engage for or against a theory as in a debate. It could
be one or two people’s theories. The second will be an applied essay in which
we will apply a theory to the real world. For example, we can argue whether
Taylor Swift’s songs are high or low art.
There
will be two short answer quizzes and no exam.
Upon leaving class
I went immediately to the U of T Book Store to inquire about iclickers, the
prices and whether or not second hand ones were available. I found out that
used ones get snapped up right away, so all they had were new iclickers for
$45.00. I considered taking an overdraft on my account to buy one, then I’d end
up paying a penalty and it would ultimately cost me more. My grant usually
comes through at the end of the first week of classes, so I decided to
sacrifice the tiny loss of a percentage of one percent that would result from
not having a clicker for one or two classes.
I
went up to Admissions and Awards to make sure I could leave some of my courses
unpaid for, since the first half of my grant won’t cover them all and the rest
wouldn’t come through till January. The guy behind the counter had to make a
special call to the Noah Meltz grant office. It looks like I can relax.
No comments:
Post a Comment