It was raining on Monday, September 26th
when I left for my Philosophy class, I wore my hoody with my motorcycle jacket
zipped up tightly on top of it. I also wore my spring and fall leather gloves.
My ass was wet before I even got north to Dundas.
Since
our lecture this time would be on taste, I showed Professor Russell and overlap
with his course from my Canadian Poetry course. I’d found a quote on the
subject of taste from Irving Layton, who my Philosophy instructor had never
heard of: “High culture is that underarm perspiration odour of old men” and
“Good taste is something to wipe our unstodgy behinds with.” Devlin commented
that it made him curious to find out what Irving Layton’s poetry was like.
At
the beginning of class we had a review question to answer with our iclickers.
The question was, “Can Danto’s barbarians appreciate the red squares that are
works of art. Most of us said no, but it was a trick question. They can appreciate
them, but not as art. We’ll have to watch out for this instructor come quiz
time.
What
is taste?
Sibley
says that taste knows how to apply aesthetic concepts.
Taste
is a capacity to have a certain kind of sensory experience in response to
sensory cues. It’s not purely contemplative. You feel something that has
positive or negative valance, like pleasure and pain, but not pleasure and
pain. This capacity is not merely natural receptivity like pleasure and pain,
but must be cultivated and developed through practice and training and
repetition of experience. Taste is a sensory property to feel positive or
negative towards sensible properties.
He
showed us two images. One was a piece of colourful pop art and the other looked
like a photograph of a magnified round metal object. He wanted to know if the
images evoked nice feelings or disgust. I preferred the coloured one for the
colours but the photograph for its shape.
He
told us that what we had just dome was exercise taste.
He
showed a slick photo of the new iphone beside a straight photo of the old
Blackberry. Then he showed us two dresses worn by women at the Emmy awards. One
was a sexy red dress in a classical style with one shoulder exposed. The other
was a green dress with intricate embroidery that I thought made it more
interesting but most people voted for the red dress.
He
then showed us an expensive bottle of wine beside a cheap one.
Good
versus bad taste. Given that capacity is a sensitivity, it can be more or less
sensitive, depending on practice. Wine tasting requires developing the palate.
Good
taste is high functioning, sophisticated sensitivity.
Bad
taste is low functioning and unsophisticated.
There
are tastemakers, standards of taste and right or wrong aesthetic reactions to
have. But there are no rules for taste.
For
Hume, good taste is the consensus among sophisticated critics with high
functioning, practiced and developed sensitivity.
Devlin
mentioned Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes as being examples of this regarding
taste in films. He opined that they offer a pretty good rough estimate.
Why
is sensitivity equated with good taste? One could be sensitive to colours, for
example, and yet be considered to have bad taste by the world’s standards. Hume
would not have a good answer to this question because for him, taste is related
to culture.
For
Kant, taste is not a consensus. For him, good taste and aesthetic delight is a
harmony between form in the world and form in the mind. The sophisticated
perceiver contacts with properties of structure and in the mind of rational
perceivers there is rational structure.
After
class I headed home, but stopped at Freshco to buy grapes, cinnamon bread and
yogourt.
When
I got to my building, the landlord was coming out with the guy he’s hired to
renovate the apartment at the top of the stairs. I told him that I’d seen a
bedbug. He told me that Orkin had already come about the cockroaches last week,
but I wasn’t home. He said he’d call them again.
Jonquil
came in from outside crying, after the rain. I think she’s been spending her
time under the deck. When she comes home she acts distressed and goes places
where she’s been trained not to go. I caught her lying with her stinky body on
top of some clean laundry that was piled on the kitchen table, just as my
upstairs neighbour, David knocked on my door. A few days ago I discovered that
he’d left a bag with some cans of beer inside my door, and I’d been waiting to
see him in the hall in order to thank him. He asked if I’d gotten the bar and I
thanked him then. Then he asked to borrow twenty dollars. I didn’t hesitate,
even though I only had thirty-three dollars and change. I gave him the twenty.
He once gave me twenty dollars to buy a guitar tuner when all I did was ask if
he had one I could borrow. Over the two or three years I’ve known him he’s
probably given me a hundred dollars worth of beer. He’s also donated quite a
lot of stuff that he’s acquired from the warehouse that employs him. He told me
after I’d handed him the twenty that he’d give it back to me on Tuesday, plus
ten dollars interest. Then he handed me a big bottle of olive oil in a PC bag.
I don’t think that had been his intention at first, but rather a spontaneous
thing. I found a cigarette in the bottom of the bag that I took out and threw
it in the garbage.
No comments:
Post a Comment